Friday, October 30, 2009

Midcoast Gets the Short End of the CEQA Review Timeline

The San Mateo County Planning Director is giving the Midcoast the minimum allowable review periods for the Big Wave DEIR.  It’s up to the community to request more time to review the three telephone books thick volumes. 

At the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, October 28 Lisa Grote summarized Section 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines which spells out the CEQA review timelines - not less than 45 days nor more than 60 days unless there are "unusual circumstances".  Lisa Grote, San Mateo County Planning Director said "unusual circumstances" usually relate to failure to notice, but obviously there is lots of discretion as to what this term means. Read the CEQA Guidelines at: http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/guidelines/art8.html

Lisa Grote stated the Planning Director has the authority to extend the deadline, not the Planning Commission.  Lisa said staff will agendize a discussion of the extension of time for the November 18th Planning Commission hearing. Planning Commissioner Gail Slocum tried to get the discussion scheduled for the next meeting (November 3), but Lisa Grote said that Agenda was already published and could not be changed.

Please consider emailing Lisa Grote, Planning Director and request additional time to review the DEIR (three phone book thick volumes).
Lisa Grote, Planning Director: lgrote@co.sanmateo.ca.us

Please Cc the County Planning Commissionersplanning-commission@co.sanmateo.ca.us
All 5 of the commissioners receive email at one address.

Planning Commission

William Wong
David Bomberger
Chris Ranken
Gail Slocum
Steve Dworetzky

AND

Cc the Board of Supervisors

Richard S. Gordon rgordon@co.sanmateo.ca.us
Adrienne Tissier atissier@co.sanmateo.ca.us
Rose Jacobs Gibson RoseJG@co.sanmateo.ca.us


Sunday, October 25, 2009

Big Wave EIR released

   
The Big Wave Environmental Impact Report is now available for download at the county website.  A hard copy is also at the Half Moon Bay Library and at the planning counter in Redwood City. 
 

  

    
Start of Public Comment Period and Release of Draft EIR:  
October 22, 2009
  
Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing:  
November 18, 2009 - 9:00am
Board of Supervisors Chambers
400 County Center, Redwood City

End of 45 day Public Comment Period:
December 7, 2009

  

Video: Big Wave developer blows off the public at MCC meeting

Coastsider, Feb 23, 2009 by Barry Parr
  
Things got ugly at the last Midcoast Community Council meeting, where Big Wave’s developer discussed the project’s draft Facilities Plan, but refused to answer other questions from the community on other topics.
  
Big Wave attorney interrupts citizen during public comment, who is expressing concern about the remoteness of the location, to tell her that she wants to keep the developmentally disabled away from herself, and shouts out "You're not appropriate!"
  
  
Big Wave developer says that his profit on this project he's presenting as a public service is "not relevant" and has "nothing to do with anything". He tells another asking about the commercial viability of the project "That's none of your business".
   

VIDEO of Midcoast Community Council Meeting: Feb. 11th 2009 - Big Wave

    
VIDEO: Midcoast Community Council held their bimonthly meeting on February 11th.
   
3. Regular MCC Agenda
3a. Workshop to consider and comment on the Facilities Plan submitted for the Big Wave project

Estimated Start Time: 7:45 PM Sponsor: Neil Merrilees Time line- Applicant presentation10-15 minutes,
Sponsor presentation 10-15 minutes
Applicant response 5 minutes
Public comment End time: 9:00
   

Big Wave developer presents troubling signs to wary public


Big Wave is rolling in; observe the tsunami disaster warning signs. I attended the Midcoast Community Council forum on the Big Wave project held recently. The project is a wellness center and housing plan for developmentally disabled adults coupled with large commercial business space. The plan has a combined square footage of 300,000 sq. ft. and maximum tsunami height of more than 50 feet to stand at Airport Boulevard in Moss Beach.

Before the meeting, I was concerned about the traffic congestion implications when the business park is filled to capacity because there would be 2,000 to 4,000 additional cars on a current 200 car-per-day road. Additionally, I was skeptical that there are enough frothing entrepreneurs poised to rush in and relocate their business to this remote location to ensure its long-term success.

By the end of the evening my position had changed from skeptical and attentively respectful to shocked and depressed. The majority of the supporters really made me question the wisdom and sanity of the project. I have not seen so much smugness and snickering in one room since the Bush administration. The same supporters who made emotional pleas regarding the social benefit of the project were loud and hostile when a logistical question was raised. I felt like the room was full of bullies. Seriously, one of the supporters demanded a show of hands from those in support of Big Wave. (As if the printed Big Wave stickers on people’s chests weren’t enough for an accurate visual survey.) The raised-arm salute demonstrated the overwhelming presence of supporters. I was not the only person at the meeting who thought it was physically unsafe to ask a critical question. If Big Wave’s mission and purpose is indeed so high and full of light and love as well as social and environmental stewardship, it should shine through in their collective speech and demeanor in public discourse. Love does not take on the posture of a bully. But enough about feelings, let’s talk about the economics.

Is the project economically viable? During the question-and-answer session there was annoyed refusal by the lead developer to address a legitimate feasibility question posed by a member of Surfrider Foundation about the profitability of the venture. More importantly he made no honest response regarding the realistic market potential for such a large increase of commercial real estate space. Did you know that Big Wave will double the existing commercial real estate inventory on the entire Coastside - all within Big Wave’s single marshland location? These queries were met with dismissal rather than grounded planning from Big Wave’s leader.

After attending the MCC meeting, I have minimal confidence in the sincerity of the project. The current development plan puts the local community at real risk for the creation of unoccupied industrial blight. With freedom to develop comes responsibility to be sensible in scale, sensitive to your neighbors and surrounding structures. Big Wave supporters need to make friends and partners, not roll in with puffed-up chests intimidating anyone who doesn’t wear the Big Wave symbol at public forums. Their current posture is not civic-minded and calls into question their endgame. I encourage fellow Coastsiders to get informed, find out what is going here and let your voices be heard.



Aimee Luthringer is a Moss Beach resident and surfer.
  
   


Don't lock developmentally disabled out of sight

   
Dear editor:

I applaud Merrill Bobele for his thoughtful opinion piece on Big Wave (Review, Dec. 3). Others may take issue with his assertion that Big Wave is a “flawed plan.” This is understandable given the paucity of housing, vocational and recreational support for developmentally disabled people on the coast. These individuals require consistent support, and their needs will continue long after parents can provide for them. I know. My husband and I are nearing 60, and, as parents of a 24-year-old developmentally disabled son, we recognize the daunting challenge of securing lifelong support services. Unfortunately, a project like Big Wave is not the answer.

Having spent two decades advocating on behalf of developmentally disabled members of our community, we have experienced the profoundly positive impact an accessible and integrated community has on the quality of life for people with disabilities. HOPE Services’ community-based day program, currently serving 20 young adults, is the most recent example of how, given adequate support, developmentally disabled individuals can successfully work, volunteer, go to school and enjoy leisure activities within the context of the larger community.

The current plan for Big Wave takes us in the opposite direction creating more barriers to community access rather than fewer. As Bobele points out, Big Wave “offers a separate, self-contained campus” for people with developmental disabilities situated behind locked gates, near the airport, west of Highway 1. Just getting to and from anywhere on the coast from “the campus” will require buses, vans or cars, meaning residents will effectively be cut off from the mainstream community and the mainstream community will be cut off from residents. Many of the simple, day-to-day activities most of us take for granted will be out of reach to the people living on the grounds of the Wellness Center.

Developmentally disabled people living in our community deserve a richer life than the one currently envisioned by Big Wave, and, as Bobele points out, there are alternatives.

My husband and I are actively pursuing them.

Ruth Palmer
Half Moon Bay




Big Wave isn't the answer for developmentally disabled

  
Half Moon Bay Review: Wednesday, Dec 03, 2008 by Merrill Bobele
  
I attended the Big Wave scoping meeting on Nov. 18 at El Granada Elementary School. The project, according to the developer, “provides … housing and employment opportunities … for developmentally disabled children and adults.” The meeting’s purpose was for the public to register concerns that need to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report required to gain approval by the various permitting agencies.

Many of the people attending were friends and family members of the developmentally disabled community. Those who attended that were not part of this group may have been overwhelmed by the number of supporters who spoke, most with great emotion. I, too, am the parent of a developmentally disabled adult daughter, and share similar concerns, wanting only the best for my daughter. The scoping session did not comfort my doubts that the project can meet its stated objectives.
   
The Coastside community should harness the energy that those boosters represent! But I think that it’s unfair to mislead people’s legitimate hopes and wishes with an unnecessarily flawed plan. Big Wave’s site has severe obstacles in its documented wetlands, unavailable water from a district long under moratorium, poor feeder roads and is isolated from services provided by a community.
  
The project sponsors claim they won’t use any government funds. Almost all of the potential residents of the Big Wave project are clients of the Golden Gate Regional Center. Regional Centers are entirely supported by federal and state funds, which, in turn, fund services for the developmentally disabled. Since most of the potential residents of Big Wave are GGRC clients, it’s misleading to say that Big Wave will use no government money.
  
Our community should recognize that Big Wave as proposed is only one approach to providing for the needs of the developmentally disabled population once members leave school. Speakers addressed the need to accept and integrate them into our community, and I agree. Big Wave’s model does not do this, but instead offers a separate, self-contained campus with living, working and recreation components. The preferred model is to live in existing neighborhoods, and work in the community. We should also provide recreational activities within our community. Since my daughter turned 18, she has happily lived most of the time in this kind of setting.
  
In my professional experience as a career counselor, transition specialist for School-to-Work and a job developer for the developmentally disabled, I’ve found that they go through the same career development as everyone else. They have to learn about a variety of jobs and identify their interests, likes and dislikes. One size does not fit all. Big Wave’s Project Description indicates residents work farming, landscaping, recycling/composting, and dog grooming/walking. This offers too few opportunities.
  
Contrary to what I heard said that evening, these programs do not “run themselves.” If the Big Wave business plan is to self-fund without government help, provide services such as supportive work, independent living skills, transportation and recreation, it’s obvious these programs won’t run themselves.
   
Quality services to the developmentally disabled are costly, and some individuals may require behavioral interventions. Hence the revenues of the commercial development must support the expenses for the residents of Big Wave. No one provided a market analysis for the commercial development, other than a dubious survey claiming the need for office space.
   
The Big Wave concept appears to have morphed from having the Wellness Center/residential cost met by the revenues generated by the office park to a fee-for-services model. The project description states that the “Wellness Center (will be) funded through association fees and shared development costs.” This does not seem to provide the promised “opportunities for low-income developmentally disabled children and adults” stated in the “Notice of Preparation.”
  
The EIR should offer alternative locations, which do not have as many permitting issues as the present Big Wave location. For example, a portion of Half Moon Bay’s Beachwood acquisition could accommodate the Big Wave Wellness Center housing, supported by the benefits of Section 8 Housing. The business part would not fit into Beachwood’s six permittable acres, so remains problematic for the location, but it’s permitting hardships in Moss Beach make it an unlikely survivor there. Big Wave is well-intentioned, but it is in the wrong place.
   
Merrill Bobele is a resident of El Granada and a retired teacher.




Disabled housing project won’t be on fast track

  
  
Frustrated supporters of the Big Wave project vowed to keep moving forward Tuesday, in spite of a decision by county supervisors to reject a proposed amendment to the midcoast Local Coastal Program that would have expedited construction.
Supervisors said they were not comfortable allowing an exception in the LCP for one project; while they support the plan, they said they wanted to see it take the normal Planning Commission channels.
  
“I’m pretty disappointed,” property owner and project developer Jeff Peck said.
  
Supporters of the residential and commercial development asked supervisors for changes to the LCP that would give priority water rights to residential and commercial portions of the project. Acknowledging the setback, Peck said he is confident the project will still happen.
  
Funding for Big Wave, located across from Half Moon Bay Airport, is dependent on securing water rights for the offices as well as the residences, Peck said. The plan includes 36 condos and apartments, as well as a community center with a commercial kitchen and a home movie theater, basketball court and gardens for the disabled.
    

Video: Understanding the Big Wave development in Princeton

  
Neil Merrilees explains the scope and impact of the proposed Big Wave development. Video by Darin Boville at Montara Fog.
  
This remarkable video does a better job than any environmental impact report of explaining the scale of the proposed Big Wave development, and what its impact will be on the neighborhood and the Coastside as a whole. It concludes with some thoughtful examples from Neil Merrilees of well-thought-out and properly located projects of a similar nature. The video was produced by Darin Boville for Montara Fog and is titled: 



video: Montara Fog


"Thanks for this informative video. I had no idea the size of this project." - Michael La Guardi
a