The income stream to fund the proposed Wellness Center - wherever it is eventually located - could begin immediately, if the project proponents purchased an existing office building.
A 336,000 square foot complex recently became available as a result of the collapse in the commercial real estate market and the bankruptcy of a major retailer, which had been its tenant. As the San Mateo County Times recently reported, "The implosion of Mervyn's has unleased more fallout: A lender will put the defunct retailer's empty headquarters in Hayward on the auction block, possibly at one-fifth or less of its prior value."
What a steal! For a fraction of its construction cost, the Big Wave proponents could purchase an existing office building complex, near transportation, with water, ready to rent. All they would need is tenants - the same problem they would face if they ever build the office complex on the marsh.
That income stream could begin almost immediately, funding all other parts of the Wellness Center concept. Incidentally, I've publicly stated my support for the Wellness Center concept, which, as Darin notes, would ideally be located close to transit, shopping, schools and libraries, and other essential services, while also being close to the residential areas where the parents and friends of the Wellness Center clients might live.
"Somebody is going to get a really good deal on this," said Joe Fabian, a senior vice president with Cornish & Carey, a commercial realty brokerage, according to the San Mateo County Times article. Why not make it the developmentally disabled adults the ones who benefit?
The former Mervyn's office site is not located in a tsunami zone, it is not located near the Seal Cove earthquake fault, it is not located in a marine industrial area, it is not located adjacent to an airport, it is not located on or near an environmentally sensitive habitat area, it is not built in a wetlands with high groundwater levels, it is not in a marsh - basically, it has none of the immense problems that will undoubtedly delay the proposed Big Wave project for many years.
And, as an added bonus for the many Big Wave supporters who are also Foothill Boulevard boosters, the former Mervyn's office complex is already located on Foothill Boulevard! You get everything you've always dreamed of - a Foothill Boulevard location, a (formerly) profitable office complex, and an income stream for the proposed Wellness Center.
...............................................................................
Mervyn's HQ joins default parade
Oakland Tribune: By George Avalos
Posted: 10/08/2009 05:37:11 AM PDT Updated: 10/09/2009 05:17:43 PM PDT
Posted: 10/08/2009 05:37:11 AM PDT Updated: 10/09/2009 05:17:43 PM PDT
The implosion of Mervyn's has unleashed more fallout: A lender will put the defunct retailer's empty headquarters in Hayward on the auction block, possibly at one-fifth or less of its prior value.
LaSalle Bank, now owned by Bank of America, has placed the building into receivership in a move to wrest control of the 336,000-square-foot complex from its owner, Beverly Hills-based realty investor North 3 Holdings LLC.
Earlier this year, North 3 stopped making payments on a $45 million mortgage for the building. The lender responded with an Alameda County court lawsuit in July to seize control of the complex on Foothill Boulevard in downtown Hayward.
The vast, empty building is an emblem of the troubles that confront commercial real estate, falling property values and regional and national economic woes.
Yet the meltdown in the price of the building also presents an opportunity for savvy realty investors.
"Somebody is going to get a really good deal on this," said Joe Fabian, a senior vice president with Cornish & Carey, a commercial realty brokerage.
The nine-acre site, which consists of a four-story office building, a parking garage and a surface parking lot, was bought in March 2007 for $60 million. Just a few months later, in September 2007, North 3 Holdings bought the complex for $66 million, financing the deal with a $45 million loan.
That last transaction placed a value on the site of roughly $196 a square foot and represented one of the peaks for East Bay commercial property values in 2007.
But property analysts now believe the building could sell for around $10 million to $12 million, or maybe $30 to $35 a square foot.
But property analysts now believe the building could sell for around $10 million to $12 million, or maybe $30 to $35 a square foot.
"It is a tremendous asset," said John Connolly, the Larkspur based receiver who is handling the sale of the building. "It is a headquarters type facility that somebody could occupy tomorrow."
Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, the realty brokerage marketing the building, believes that the complex is a rare opportunity. "22301 Foothill Boulevard is being offered for sale at a fraction of replacement cost," said Gerry Rohm, a senior managing director with HFF.
When the owners bought the building in the fall of 2007, Mervyn's seemed to be in decent shape. The company generated sales of $2.1 billion in the fiscal year that ended in February 2008, although Mervyn's did lose $64 million.
Plus, the real estate investment itself looked good. Mervyn's had agreed to be a tenant for 20 years, which seemed to make the mortgage manageable. Court records show the loan payments were $266,000 a month.
Things soon soured for the property owners. In July 2008, Mervyn's filed for bankruptcy protection. In October 2008, the retailer announced it would liquidate its operations and hold going-out-of-business sales during the 2008 Christmas shopping season. The store doors were shut by January of this year and the headquarters site was largely vacated by late 2008.
Earlier this year, Mervyn's won a court order that enabled it to stop making payments on the lease. That ruling erased the rental income that North 3 was receiving and the property owner decided to stop making mortgage payments.
Several future uses could be in store for the building, depending on who buys it.
"With this economy, we have no idea who might step forward," Connolly said. "We could see a wide range of offers."
A new owner could be an organization that might use the building. A realty investor might have a tenant lined up, or might have deep enough pockets to "carry" the empty building while a rental deal emerges. Or the building could be bulldozed to make way for something brand-new.
"My hunch is that it will be an investor with the time, energy, financial strength and political clout to pull off a deal like that," Fabian said. The eventual occupant could be a government agency or big institutional organization.
Still, the receiver concedes that the building won't fetch anything close to the loan amount.
"We realize that values have crashed, and in today's marketplace it is worth a fraction of what it once was," Connolly said. "The market is very humbling right now. We think the street will tell us what the price is."
0 comments:
Post a Comment