Monday, July 25, 2011

Princeton by-the-sea home to Meth Head felon with loaded rifle, gunpowder, detonation cord & propane torch

Welcome to the Neighborhood

SF Gate reported that Joel Blanchard, the 65-year-old man who started a fire while smoking meth with a blowtorch near a container of gunpowder that he had been stockpiling, was slapped with 45 days in jail....Blanchard left the blowtorch on a dryer, causing a nearby container of gunpowder to explode, said District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe.

The 
Half Moon Bay Review reported that Blanchard left a propane torch ignited on a dryer near a camper trailer at a commercial storage yard at the 200 block of Yale Avenue where he lived, according to San Mateo County Sheriff's officials. The torch lit a container of gunpowder he was storing, causing a loud explosion and fire that led emergency officials to the scene.

John Blanchard

Sheriff's deputies who investigated the incident said they later learned that Blanchard was under the influence of methamphetamine. During a search of his trailer, emergency officials found a loaded rifle, more gunpowder and about 300 feet of detonation cord - items that were illegal for him to possess as a former felon.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Big Wave = Big Pave?

by Lennie Roberts

The Chapter has joined other environmental groups in appealing the San Mateo County Planning Commission's three-to-two approval of the Big Wave Project to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. The other groups are the Committee for Green Foothills, Surfrider, California Pilots Association, Pillar Ridge Homeowners Association, and the San Mateo County League for Coastside Protection.


This farmland would turn into a massive office complex if Big Wave is built.
Located on low-lying agricultural fields on the coast adjacent to the environmentally sensitive Pillar Point Marsh, Big Wave proposes building a 225,000-square-foot office park in massive 46-foot-high buildings plus housing for 50 developmentally disabled adults and 20 caregivers. The Chapter is sympathetic to the needs of the disabled, but this location is a dangerous and inappropriate location for this development.
The project would conflict with the county general plan, zoning, and the Local Coastal Program (the basic planning that guides development along the coast). Its location is inherently hazardous: it's adjacent to the active Seal Cove-San Gregorio Fault and within the 100-year flood plain and tsunami hazard zone. The housing's location so close to the runway at Half Moon Bay Airport is incompatible with the safe operation of the airport. Traffic studies indicate that up to 2,123 peak-hour vehicle trips per day would have to squeeze through two narrow access roads to reach the site.
Sewer and water infrastructure does not currently exist, and local agencies have not committed to connecting the property. Endangered species and sensitive wetlands in the Pillar Point Marsh could also be affected.
The developer is asking for a 20-year development agreement, which would lock in approvals and allow construction to be spread out over two decades, subjecting neighbors and the coastal environment to the impacts of a protracted construction project.
The woefully inadequate Environmental Impact Report (EIR) generated some 250 comments from the public and responsible agencies. When the developer refused to pay the additional costs to have the independent EIR consultant prepare responses to comments, the county planning department agreed to collaborate with the developer in writing the responses. This calls into serious question whether the EIR meets the legally-required standards of impartiality and independence.
The Appeal will likely be heard in March. An adverse ruling could be appealed to the California Coastal Commission.
Lennie Roberts is the Legislative Advocate for the Committee for Green Foothills and is a longstanding member of the Chapter.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Youth In Nursing Homes Seek Alternative Care

by JOSEPH SHAPIRO . NPR News

December 9, 2010

In a hotel ballroom outside Atlanta, a young man glides his wheelchair to the front of the meeting room. With his twisted hand he hits a button on a small gray box attached to the front of the chair and a machine speaks for him.

"I am Mathew Harp, and I am 22 years old."

The voice from the machine is crisp, modulated and not too mechanical. Harp has a muscle disorder and cannot speak, so he types his speech into the machine.

"I have a lot of special needs," he says, "and when I was 21 years old, I had to move into a nursing home because my mother and my sisters could not take care of me by themselves any longer."

Picture a nursing home and you think of a place for the elderly. But yearly federal nursing home data shows that there are more than 6,000 young people up to the age of 21 living in American nursing homes. And there are thousands more who are in their early 20s.

This spring, Harp gave a speech to a group of Georgia parents whose children are living in nursing facilities. It was part of the Children's Freedom Initiative, an effort by a group of Georgia disability advocates to track down every child in the state living in a nursing home and show their parents alternatives to nursing-home placement.

For Harp, the nursing home was an unhappy place.

"I was the youngest person in the nursing home. Most of the others were very old. I had only a few friends that would come and see me. I missed everyone very much," he says. "And I wanted to leave. I wanted to live with my family so that I would not miss them so much."

After a year in the nursing home, Harp got his wish and, in March, he moved back into his mother's home. That was possible because a state and federal program paid for the aides who come to his house nine hours every day. They help him get up, get dressed and eat.

Money from another program called Money Follows the Person paid to renovate his mother's rented house to make it more accessible for Harp. It even paid for the new concrete sidewalk outside so he can maneuver his wheelchair out of the house and into his mother's van. (A few months later, he used his new ability to choose where he wanted to live and moved into the house of the woman who provides his attendant care.)

Harp's speech was followed the next day by a van tour also organized by the Children's Freedom Initiative to showcase alternatives to long-term care in a nursing home.

"Today I hope that the families will just be able to develop a vision for what's possible for their children to live a life in the community," Katie Chandler says before the tour. She works for the Georgia Advocacy Office, a disability legal group, and as part of her advocacy, helped start the Children's Freedom Initiative.

Chandler tracked down more than 80 children and young adults from Georgia who live in state hospitals and then invited some of their parents on the tour. She told the parents that even children with the most severe disabilities can get good — and even better — care outside of a nursing home.

Chandler says someone who needs 24-hour care may not actually be getting that in a nursing home; the person may be seeing an actual nurse only 15 minutes a day.

"So what you're really getting is CNA care, the certified nursing assistant," she says. "They help you with your physical needs [getting in and out of a wheelchair, bathing and eating] and that can easily be done in the community."

The van tour visited a group home, a family who cares for their son with state-paid nurses in their own home, and an adult foster home.

Bylon's Story

On the tour was 23-year-old Bylon Alexander, of Athens, Georgia. When she was 6, she suffered a stroke. Her mother cared for her at home, but got sick and was hospitalized. So at the age of 22, Alexander entered a nursing home.

"Just recently," she says, putting a pause between each word, "my mom died."

The day of the funeral, aides at the nursing home got Alexander dressed, but the van that was supposed to take her never showed up and she missed her mother's funeral.

Now, she worries she's in the nursing home to stay. "I don't have anyone to take care of me. So I think I'm stuck where I'm at," she says.

Many of the 1.5 million people who live in nursing homes, however, say they do want to live in a facility. They may have disabilities so complex that the nursing home is the place they feel they get the best care. And even for people like Alexander, who want the choice to leave, it was the nursing home that provided a solution when there was no other place to go.

Also along on the tour are Sally Carter and Bobbie Davidson. They once held top positions at state institutions for people with disabilities. At first they were skeptical that the people they looked after could get good care in their own homes, but not anymore.

Now, as consultants for the state, they help people with disabilities negotiate the tricky bureaucracy of getting out of institutions and nursing homes.

Can anybody get out of an institution or a nursing home and live in a group home like the one on the tour? "Yes," Carter says, "with the right supports. Absolutely."

Davidson adds, "It's cheaper in most cases." In Georgia, it costs more to provide care at home less than 3 percent of the time, she says.

A Mother Yearns To Bring Her Son Home

Parents on the tour mostly say their children ended up in a nursing home because they had no other choice.

For Nola Sayne it happened 13 years ago. Her son Zach, now 23, was just 10 when he had a feeding tube inserted into his stomach. His after-school program kicked him out when staff said they could not do the feedings, and no other after-school program would take him. Zach has cerebral palsey, has seizures and is partially blind.

Sayne placed a want ad in the paper and found an older woman who said she'd take Zach into her home day care. But it didn't last. After a week, the woman called her and said to come get him. Sayne found him sitting on the porch with his things.

"She was in the house. She opened up the door when I came and said, 'I'm sorry,' and she was in tears," Sayne says. "Then she slammed the door. I didn't know what to do."

Sayne thought about quitting her job as a paralegal, but she was a single mother then with two kids. She needed her salary and health insurance for Zach.

The state of Georgia would provide help only if he lived in a nursing home, so Sayne took her severely disabled son to one. Making the decision to do this, she says, "was really hard. Very, very depressing."

The closest nursing home that would take Zach was in Montgomery, Ala., a 400-mile round trip from their home. For the past 13 years, Sayne has made that drive every two or three weeks. When Zach is sick and hospitalized, she's taken off from work and stayed with him for days at a time.

Now, she wants her medically fragile son to live closer to her near Atlanta.

"If he is sick, I'll be able to be there quickly," she says. "I won't have to worry about will I make it in time. Because with him, you know, he's had pneumonia so many times, and he could take a turn for the worse very quickly. And I've always worried about being able to get to him. I don't want him to die without me. Just to be blunt about it."

When the tour makes its way to a "host" home — a kind of adult foster care — Sayne can see a potential option. The home is run by a woman who quit her job at a hospital and gets paid to take care of four disabled girls 24 hours a day.

"It gives me a lot of hope, actually," Sayne says. "I'm excited."

More Stumbling Blocks

But leaving a nursing home isn't easy.

In October, Sayne received a disturbing letter in the mail. The Catholic order that runs her son's pediatric nursing home announced it was out of money and sold it to a private company. The new company is providing good care and has assured Sayne there is no pressure for Zach to leave.

But there's a Catch 22: Because Zach has lived in a nursing home in another state for 13 years, and because he's now an adult, he's no longer considered a citizen of Georgia. It will be hard to get him onto Georgia's Medicaid program and closer to home.

It won't be easy, either, for Alexander, who ended up in a nursing home after her mother died.

She got state approval to move out of the nursing home and into her own home, so she made it a goal to move out by her 24th birthday. That was at the end of October. She's on a long waiting list for aides and for a wheelchair-accessible apartment.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

East Bay office buildings default

By George Avalos  .  Oakland Tribune  .  12-7-2010

Lenders have seized three big office projects totaling seven buildings in the East Bay that were hobbled by delinquent mortgages, a reminder that foreclosures still haunt the region's economy.

The properties that were repossessed in recent weeks include an office building and adjacent parking lot at 1111 Jackson St. in downtown Oakland; an office building at 2015 Shattuck Ave. in Berkeley; and Stoneridge Corporate Plaza, a five-building complex in Pleasanton near the regional shopping mall, according to Alameda County records.

The foreclosures hint at nagging weakness in the Bay Area office property market.

"It's a sign of the times," said William Nork, senior vice president with Cornish & Carey, a commercial realty brokerage.

According to county files, Bank of America on Nov. 19 seized the 39,000-square-foot Oakland building and the 50,000-square-foot Berkeley building, both owned by a unit of realty firm Scanlan Kemper Bard Cos.

In September, lender Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. foreclosed on the five-building, 562,000-square-foot Stoneridge Corporate Plaza.

In each of the foreclosures, the lenders priced the properties far below their prior values.

Scanlan Kemper, or SKB, bought the Oakland and Berkeley buildings and the parking lot in 2007 for $61.5 million. Through the foreclosure, Bank of America valued the two buildings and the lot at a combined $26.6 million -- a 57 percent decline from just three years earlier.

MetLife placed a value of $69.1 million on Stoneridge Corporate Plaza, which was 21 percent below the $87.5 million mortgage on the property. The insurance company intends to hold on to the Pleasanton office complex.

Bank of America, though, may decide to sell the Berkeley building, which is empty, and the Oakland building, which is expected to lose several major tenants.

These and other foreclosures could create big-time bargains for investors who hunger to gobble up office buildings at a discount.

"If you have cash, certainly there are deals out there for investors," said Ken Meyersieck, senior vice president with Colliers International, a commercial real estate brokerage.

Potential buyers, though, may well attempt to squeeze ultralow prices from the lenders.

"The investors will have to buy these buildings at cheap enough prices that they can undercut their neighbors with their rental rates," said Edward Del Beccaro, managing director with Grubb & Ellis, a realty firm.

Owners of office buildings may have to be aggressive because the Bay Area's moribund economy still is not creating many new jobs. Employers often simply want new spaces at less expensive rental rates.

"In the East Bay, the only way you can rent your buildings is to steal tenants from other buildings," Del Beccaro said. "So you have to price at least 10 percent below your neighbors."

The ongoing foreclosures mean that the nose-dive in values for office buildings might not be over yet.

"We don't have a bottom to office prices yet," Del Beccaro said. "Eventually, the foreclosures will create a new bottom."

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Good judgment is not a prerequisite for the San Mateo County Planning Commissioners Ranken, Dworetzky & Wong

On Tuesday morning three San Mateo County Planning Commissioners approved the overblown Big Wave office park project next to the Fitzgerald Marine Reserve and Maverick's surf break. The County Planning Commissioners make decisions on projects located in unincorporated areas.

Three County Planning Commissioners with poor judgment:

After the Planning Commission hearing Chris Ranken of Pacifica said, "The eight subdivisions of existing land indicate the land owner is planning to sell parcels." Ranken said he approved the project because, "It will bring tax revenue to the coast." When it was pointed out that tax revenue would go to the County not the unincorporated coastside Ranken looked confused as if he was thinking of his days on the Pacifica Planning Commission. 

The Board of Supervisors should require that County Planning Commissioners live in an unincorporated area. 

County Planning, Public Works and the Board of Supervisors have a long history of failing to providing basic infrastructure for the unincorporated Coastside. Very little tax revenue goes towards projects in the unincorporated areas of the County. If a neighborhood needs a road replaced, street lights or storm-water drainage improvements Jim Porter the Director of Public Works meets with the community and tells folks they will have to pay for an assessment district. The Board of Supervisors is happy to allow new development but neglects to put money back into roads and infrastructure.